Netmod Working Group,

The presentation at IETF 116 on the YANG unknown bits typedef seemed to be 
positively received.

I've updated the draft in version -02 to incorporate a hallway suggestion (from 
Rob, I think?) to rename the bits from a pattern of "unknown-N" to "bit-N".  
Please find the information for the updated draft pasted below my original 
request for adoption.

Having given my presentation and seeing there seems to be interest in the work, 
could we consider adoption?

-- Jeff




> On Feb 20, 2023, at 1:23 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The current version of this small draft has addressed the discussion points 
> to date.
> 
> I'd like to request that the netmod WG consider adopting this draft.  
> Alternatively, if it's thought useful but more appropriate to carry this work 
> on elsewhere (e.g. rtgwg), I'd appreciate such feedback.
> 
> For the process folk, I am unaware of any applicable IPR covering this draft.
> 
> -- Jeff
> 

Name:           draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits
Revision:       02
Title:          Representing Unknown YANG bits in Operational State
Document date:  2023-04-10
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          18
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits-02.txt 
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits-02.txt>
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits/ 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits/>
Html:           
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits-02.html 
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits-02.html>
Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits>
Diff:           
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits-02 
<https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits-02>

Abstract:
  Protocols frequently have fields where the contents are a series of
  bits that have specific meaning.  When modeling operational state for
  such protocols in YANG, the 'bits' YANG built-in type is a natural
  method for modeling such fields.  The YANG 'bits' built-in type is
  best suited when the meaning of a bit assignment is clear.

  When bits that are currently RESERVED or otherwise unassigned by the
  protocol are received, being able to model them is necessary in YANG
  operational models.  This cannot be done using the YANG 'bits' built-
  in type without assigning them a name.  However, YANG versioning
  rules do not permit renaming of named bits.

  This draft proposes a methodology to represent unknown bits in YANG
  operational models and creates a YANG typedef to assist in uniformly
  naming such unknown bits.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to