On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:15 AM Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:46:05PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > > > > Which merge fails? > > > > <running> + <system> = <intended> > > So far this merge step does not exist (and it may be bad if it would > exist). The WGs need to think very careful about introducing such a > step and the consequences. > > I have not seen much real interest in NMDA, except for the <operational> datastore. - retrieval of operational values of configuration data nodes - operational context for invoking YANG actions These are real issues that NMDA solves, in a way that is quite compatible with non-NMDA deployment. The additional datastores (intended, system) seem less compatible and more architectural than practical. I hope the immutable flag will work with non-NMDA as well as the current NMDA. /js > > Andy > -- > Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
