Hi Balazs, Can you response to this IPR poll please?
FWIW, your response to this poll is not indicative of your support for the draft, which is what the adoption poll is for. Kent > On Aug 22, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As a prerequisite for the adoption on this document: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it. > > Thanks. > Kent (as co-chair) > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
