On 2024-01-31, at 16:46, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Clearly the email is the “confirmation" on the list, and hence it didn't > seem wrong to predictively say "the WG agrees”.
The minutes are minutes of the *meeting*. The WG wasn’t all there, so “the WG agrees” can’t have happened in the meeting. We tend to speak about “consensus of the room” if we want the minutes to assess whether the room agreed. If you get confirmation of the “consensus in the room” later on, you might want to add a note to the minutes, but that is not formally part of the minutes. (Consensus in the room is a good basis for a follow-on confirmation call on the list, because you don’t have to ask all people again who where there in the room. But I don’t think you should hide a consensus call in some meeting minutes.) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
