Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-32: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Francis Dupont for the GENART review. ** Section 10 says “ There are no RPC operations defined in this YANG module.” However, in Figure 1 there is: | | +---x generate-csr {csr-generation}? Which appears to be generate-csr-grouping from draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types. Should the Security Considerations of draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types be mentioned? Is this Section 10 language of “no RPC operations defined”accurate – is it because the thinking is that this functionality is imported (via ct:asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping)? _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
