Hi Med et. al., > On Sep 27, 2024, at 5:34 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Section 4.14 specifies a set of YANG statements that MUST have a description > substatement, but I don’t think anydata should be omitted here. Thoughts? > [Med] This list is inherited from 8407, which in its turn was inherited from > 6087. anydata wasn’t in 6087 because it wasn’t defined at the time in 6020. I > don’t have the context whether this was considered by the WG in the past, but > I’m afraid that adding this mandatory will break existing models. For > example, pyang does not make that check for anydata, while it is in place for > anyxml. I suggest we leave the list as it is. > That seems like a valid concern for this NBC update, I am okay with keeping > this as it is, if there is no objections from others.
Wait, `anydata` should have a description (just like `anyxml`). It clearly seems to be an omission from before that should be rectified now. FWIW, it doesn’t matter what the tools do, or what tools folks use, if any at all. Also, the tools follow the specifications, not the other way around. I recommend adding `anydata` and filing a ticket on the `pyang` issue tracker. Kent / contributor
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
