Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In 3.2, I found this statement to be confusing, perhaps because of my limited familiarity with YANG: "The port numbers can be individual port numbers, a range of port numbers, and an operation." At the least, I would have expected "or", and I didn't know what "an operation" would represent in the context of port numbers. This seems to be referencing RFC 8519's `port-range-or-operator` grouping, which allows for a single port number, a range of port numbers, or a combination of a single port number with an operator (which in turn can be `eq`, `neq`, `lte`, or `gte`). Clearer wording and an explicit reference might be helpful here, though I assume the intended audience is already familiar with YANG conventions. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-le...@ietf.org
