On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:29 AM <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: > > Hi Acee, all, > (moving this discussion to netmod, hence cci everyone else) > > The guidance so far was to avoid "data module" and "YANG model". Benoît has > more context on this when he was OPS AD. > > Let's us use this discussion to converge on some clear guidance for every one. > > Here is a first draft of guidance I suggest we add to 8407bis. This inspires > from the guidance I shared earlier in this thread: > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://netmod-wg.github.io/rfc8407bis/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt&url_2=https://netmod-wg.github.io/rfc8407bis/model-vs-module/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt > > Do we need to say more/less? Is this still confusing? Obviously, text is > welcome and makes the editor happy ;-)
IMHO it is to the point, clear, and I agree with the text. I must admit though that I sloppily use YANG model and YANG module somewhat interchangeably. Time for change I guess. Thanks for the clear guidance! -- Per _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-le...@ietf.org
