The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models' (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28.txt) as Best Current Practice
This document is the product of the Network Modeling Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Mahesh Jethanandani and Mohamed Boucadair. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis/ Technical Summary This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of specifications containing YANG modules, including IANA-maintained modules. Recommendations and procedures are defined, which are intended to increase interoperability and usability of Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF Protocol implementations that utilize YANG modules. This document obsoletes RFC 8407. Also, this document updates RFC 8126 by providing additional guidelines for writing the IANA considerations for RFCs that specify IANA-maintained modules. Working Group Summary Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting? For example, was there controversy about particular points or were there decisions where the consensus was particularly rough? There was no controversy about any particular points in the WG itself. However, the document did get some feedback as part of the TSVART review, which was considered by the WG, but the rough consensus from the WG was not to adopt the changes as suggested. Here is a direct link to that review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/QcAw9pagRaSHRvQpq8fGExRqtHE/ And here is a direct link to the related discussion within WG: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KJoBZCXsf-2YE2r2yw_WmcVrP6I/ Document Quality Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that merit special mention as having done a thorough review, e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review, what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type Review, on what date was the request posted? This document is a BCP. Personnel The Document Shepherd for this document is Qiufang Ma. The Responsible Area Director is Mahesh Jethanandani. IANA Note There is an IANA Considerations section that requests a few updates to the IANA registries and in addition, add a reference to the document. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-le...@ietf.org
