> On Jul 29, 2025, at 12:40 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Eric, > >> On Jul 29, 2025, at 8:49 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> >> wrote: >> >> ### Compliant with NMDA ? >> >> AFAIK, RFC 8407 section 3.5 recommends stating in the introduction whether >> the >> YANG module complies with NMDA (RFC 8342). As draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis is >> not yet approved, it seems to me that the previous guidance should be >> followed. > > Is this true for documents that are in the RFC Editor queue (which rfc8407bis > is)?
I agree that we should follow RFC8407BIS and we’ve using it as the definitive reference for YANG models (e.g., the new “Security Considerations” template). Thanks, Acee > > Cheers. > > > Mahesh Jethanandani > mjethanand...@gmail.com > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-le...@ietf.org
