Hi Sheng, > On Oct 11, 2025, at 7:00 PM, Sheng Jiang via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Document: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang > Title: Common Interface Extension YANG Data Models > Reviewer: Sheng Jiang > Review result: Has Nits > > I have reviewed this document as part of the OPS directorate's ongoing effort > to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments that are > not > addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. > Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other > last call comments. > > Document: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17 > Reviewer: Sheng Jiang > Review Date: 2025-10-12 > Result: Has Nits > > This standard track document This document defines two YANG modules that > augment the Interfaces data model defined in the "YANG Data Model for > Interface > Management". It is well-written. I have only found a couple of Nits: > > There are a few acronyms terms has no explanation. They should be expanded > when > they first appear.
Can you be explicit about what acronmyms you are referring to? > Section 9 has an open quate [RFCAAAA], which should be > replaced by an real RFC number. I believe this has been addressed in the latest version. Thanks Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
