Thanks Kent. I'd suggest putting that in an Operational Considerations
section...
Regards,Reshad.
On Monday, November 10, 2025 at 01:20:38 PM EST, Kent Watsen
<[email protected]> wrote:
I like Reshad's idea.
Kent // contributor
On Nov 7, 2025, at 2:02 PM, Reshad Rahman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
One comment/question I had @ IETF123 was the ability to get the non-expanded
config (e.g. to check that the config on the device is what was pushed). I just
took a look at the latest revision and it seems simple to do so: get-data on
<running> will return non-expanded config whereas on get-data <intended> will
return expanded config. Worth mentioning in the document?
Regards,Reshad.
On Friday, November 7, 2025 at 12:33:48 AM EST, Deepak Rajaram (Nokia)
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello All,
Just a quick update — work on the draft- YANG Configuration Templates is
continuing. We’re making steady progress considering the feedback from
IETF-123-Madrid, and will share the next revision once key sections including
the validation aspects are finalized. The requirements(from interim)
traceability is also being worked upon.
Regards,
Deepak(On behalf of the authors)
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
