Juergen, et. al, Does this updated pattern work?
> On Dec 10, 2025, at 12:49 PM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2025, at 19:18, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >>> pattern '[fF][eE][89aAbB].*'; > > The WG’s intent is clear from the description: > > description > "The ipv6-address-link-local type represents a link-local IPv6 > address in the prefix fe80::/10 as defined in Section 2.5.6 of > RFC 4291."; > > So this needs to be fixed. > > The pattern proposed doesn’t quite work right, though, as it would include > > FE8:: > > …which is not in fe80::/10. > > Suggestion: > > pattern '[fF][eE][89aAbB][0-9a-fA-F]:.*'; > > Grüße, Carsten > Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
