Document: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename Title: YANG module file name convention Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2026-02-18 IETF LC End Date: 2026-03-03 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: In section 2, the text says that if one chooses to use the semver in the file name, one uses it instead of the revision date. However, the syntax diagram seems to say that both are permitted, with the revision date coming first. I wonder if there should be a comment about the risk of long semver names causing file names to exceed some system limits? _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
