The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9907,
"Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8880

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Mohamed BOUCADAIR <[email protected]>

Section: 4.30.3.2

Original Text
-------------
IANA is requested to add this note to the registry:

    New values must not be directly added to the "iana-foo" YANG
    module.  They must instead be added to the "foo" registry.

Corrected Text
--------------
IANA is requested to add this note to the registry:

    New values must not be directly added to the "iana-foo" YANG
    module.  They must instead be added to the "foo" registry.

IANA is requested to add this note to [reference-to-the-iana-foo-
registry]:

   When this registry is modified, the YANG module "iana-foo"
   [IANA_FOO_URL] must be updated as defined in RFC IIII.

Notes
-----
* The note was present in the approved draft, but was lost during editing of 
that section. The note was at the button of the template but, as can be seen in 
Section 4.30.3.1, it was moved upper to group both notes.

* Section 5.3.1 (Requirements for All Modules) says:

CURRENT:

   In addition, when the module is published, IANA must add the
   following notes to:

   The YANG Module Names registry:
      New values must not be directly added to the "iana-foo" YANG
      module.  They must instead be added to the "foo" registry.

   The underlying registry:
      When this registry is modified, the YANG module "iana-foo"
      [IANA_FOO_URL] must be updated as defined in RFC IIII.

* IANA will always implement these two actions per 5.3.1, but better to have 
the templates in 4.30.3.1/4.30.3.2 consistent.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC9907 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-28)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents 
Containing YANG Data Models
Publication Date    : March 2026
Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Boucadair, Ed., Q. Wu
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Network Modeling
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to