Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps you would argue that this is what wiki-pages are, but in my > experience they often seem to end up being out of date, probably more > out of data than RFCs.
The trac-based tools wiki was very hard to work with, and that kinda put
damper on updates, but I keep hoping the new tool will do better...
> But for the moment, it feels to me that the easiest and most expedient
> process is just to go through the normal RFC process here - and
> minimizing time and work is my main goal here. But if there is a
> consensus to keep it as a living WG doc, or put it on a wiki then that
> would probably be okay with me too.
Maybe both?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
** My working hours and your working hours may be different. **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
