No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Kent
> On Apr 19, 2026, at 12:02 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of WG adoption, > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please > answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you > are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as > an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF > IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of > others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more > information, please see https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/ > > Thank you, > Lou (Co-Chair) > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
