Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-11: No Record
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Please consider these comments when preparing the next revision of this document: I think the abstract ought to explain this defines the method, not describes it, e.g.g: /This document presents YANG module file name convention/This document defines the YANG module file name convention/ I couldn't decide if this ought to be lower case or upper case 'RECOMMENDED', please rephrase to avoid this comment: /In short, the YANG semantic version file name scheme is recommended/ I don't understand the requirement in section 4 that states: /It MUST be ensured that the files' contents are identical./ NiTs: /withouth/without/ /that use/that uses/ /MAY be created as well/MAY be created./ Best wishes, Gorry _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
