Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work done in the document. Nevertheless some non-blocking comments: ### Section 2 In `The name of the files SHOULD be of the form` the SHOULD has no guidance required per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/ This also contradicts (apparently) the later sentence `then a file name that use the YANG semantic version MUST be created`. It is also unclear whether TWO files are to be created? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ### Abstract s/This document presents/This document *defines*/ as it is a PS I-D. ### Section 2 Should the ASCII code for '@' be specified as well ? _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
