I clicked send a little too quickly - this is a “no objection” position; I changed it.
— Chris Inacio SEC AD > On Monday, Jun 01, 2026 at 11:39 PM, Christopher Inacio via Datatracker > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > Christopher Inacio has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-11: No Record > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the short and concise draft. > > Thanks to Barry L., and Joel H. for their reviews. (Both caught the ABNF > notation issues about semver / date.) > > I would like to echo Éric's comments about if this draft intends to recommend > making two copies of the same YANG module? > > > If the YANG module (or submodule) has an associated YANG semantic version > (ysv:version), then a file name that use the YANG semantic version MUST be > created. In addition, a file with the revision date in the file name MAY be > created as well. > > That is what that paragraph says unless I'm really mistaken. > > I don't know what to make of Section 2.1. The SemVer will indicate some amount > of compatibility, but then everything else is caveat emptor? How would this > file naming standard help when there are multiple competing versions? > > The working group absolutely wants IANA to create 2 entries for each YANG > module that has a SemVer version attached AND wants IANA to ensure that the > contents of the modules are identical? What does identical mean in this case? > Byte-by-byte equivalence? > > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
