Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-26: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to David Mandelberg for their secdir review. Also thanks to Tony Li for their opsdir review. Section 2: I think what the authors call 'branched revision history' of Yang modules, is what I would refer to a fork in code/s/w development. It doesn't often go well for s/w development, but maybe Yang modules are different. I certainly don't know enough about how Yang is actually used to tell. Section 4.3: The addition of the _COMPAT to the end of the version number seems to make this super complicated, especially when you add what is documented in draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning with its NBC and BC terminology. Section 11, para 2: draft-ietf-tls-8446bis is in AUTH 48, it might make sense to use that vice RFC8446. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
