Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-26: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

** Section 12.2
   In addition to following the rules specified in the IANA
   Considerations section of [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning],
   IANA maintained YANG modules and submodules MUST also include a YANG
   Semver version identifier for all new revisions, as defined in
   Section 4.

   The YANG Semver version associated with the new revision MUST follow
   the rules defined in Section 4.5.
   Note: For IANA maintained YANG modules and submodules that have
   already been published, versions MUST be retroactively applied to all
   existing revisions when the next new revision is created, starting at
   version "1.0.0" for the initial published revision, and then
   incrementing according to the YANG Semver rules specified in
   Section 4.5.

Please do not use BCP14 keywords in IANA considerations text.  See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Gyan Mishra for the GENART review.

** Section 6.1
  As IETF modules are not
   expected to require branching in their revision history, the
   '_COMPAT' modifier SHOULD NOT be used in IETF published modules.

Unqualified “SHOULD NOT”.  When is it acceptable to use ‘_COMPAT’ modifier?



_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to