Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Joel Halpern for the GENART review. Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS feedback. ** Section 2. In short, the YANG semantic version file name scheme is RECOMMENDED, as its use will convey compatibility status at a glance without the need to read the module. If a system or tooling can't handle the YANG module file name convention, it is acceptable to not support or use the convention defined in this document. If I am the developer of a YANG module who do I know that "a system or tooling can't handle this new file name convention" whereby allowing me to ignore the recommendation? _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
