Hi, As the author, I support the adoption of this document with the aim of helping gain and guide consensus towards the next version of YANG, and of documenting and reporting the evolving consensus to the community in a way that the WG can easily track.
I don't think that it necessarily should be taken all the way to RFC, probably that is something that the working group could decide down the line, but my leaning is that this should not be necessary since the YANG 2.0 RFC will likely indicate how it has changed. Kind regards, Rob From: Lou Berger <[email protected]> Date: Friday, 5 June 2026 at 13:44 To: NetMod WG <[email protected]> Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]> Subject: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-wilton-netmod-yang-next-agreement-00 Hello, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilton-netmod-yang-next-agreement/ Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) May 19. Thank you, Lou (as Co-chair)
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
