Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag-13: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Authors, WG, # Gunter Van de Velde, RTG AD, comments for draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag-13.txt # line numbers are rendered from the idnits tool found at https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag-13.txt # Many thanks for very expedited processing of all my comments and the 3 blocking DISCUSS's. Only a single DISCUSS remains. (Original Ballot: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/BtoCfErmFw8PwwD_etXl9GSasXE/) # remaining DISCUSS positions (See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/cgk1qyysYg9P_D-5DvGoSRYmc8k/) [DISCUSS#1] The context and explanation from Mahesh helps to understand how this textual in-accuracy was inherited from RFC9907. Knowing this aspect, I agree that it is not fair to keep your document hostage (=blocked) with a DISCUSS because the in-accuracy is in an inherited text from another document that normatively mandates to use the not-accurate text. I'll clear the discuss after understanding how OPS-ADS @Mahesh Jethanandani<mailto:[email protected]> @Mohamed Boucadair<mailto:[email protected]> intend to structurally resolve the in-accuracy that slipped into RFC9907. The correct SSH transport RFC should of been RFC 4253 (The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol) and not RFC 4252 (The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol). If this does not get changed, then more and more drafts with a YANG module will end up having an incorrect reference. [DISCUSS#2] resolved and DISCUSS#2 considered closed [DISCUSS#3] resolved and DISCUSS#3 considered closed _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
