Hi Roman, We have addressed the issue you pointed out below. Regards,Reshad (on behalf of the authors). A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-17.txt has been successfully submitted by Reshad Rahman and posted to the IETF repository.
Name: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning Revision: 17 Title: Updated YANG Module Revision Handling Date: 2026-06-29 Group: netmod Pages: 40 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-17.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/ HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-17 On Wednesday, June 3, 2026 at 02:58:38 PM EDT, Reshad Rahman <[email protected]> wrote: Thank you Roman. We got similar feedback from Med and we will address it in the next revision. Regards,Reshad. On Wednesday, June 3, 2026 at 02:38:57 PM EDT, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-16: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 9.2 In all cases, IANA MUST follow the versioning guidance specified in Section 3.1, and MUST include a "rev:non-backwards-compatible" substatement to the latest revision statement whenever an IANA maintained module is updated in a non-backwards-compatible way, as described in Section 3.2. Please do not use BCP14 keywords in IANA considerations text. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Joel Halpern for the GENART review. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
