Hi, Roman, Thanks for the review.
The reference is used for the line-wrapping notation within examples in appendix B (e.g., https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag-13#appendix-B.1), which idnits does not parse as an explicit reference. We have added an explicit reference in the draft, see https://github.com/netmod-wg/immutable-flag/pull/34/changes. This should fully address the idnits issue (but I have not checked it yet). Best regards, Qiufang //co-author -----Original Message----- From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2026 4:47 AM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag-13: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-immutable-flag/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Joel Halpern for the GENART review. ** Editorial. Idnits returned: == Unused Reference: 'RFC8792' is defined on line 778, but no explicit reference was found in the text _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
