Hi vadim, Yes. So the bitrate should represent the avarage and peakrate. Than we know that the intergap is a constant value.
Regards Jack Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 13 apr. 2018 om 10:12 heeft Vadim Kochan <vadi...@gmail.com> het volgende > geschreven: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:51 AM, jack scholte <jack.scho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Great tools but about: >> >> Trafgen, with -b Option i.e. 100 Mbps results in microbursts. Thus a lot of >> packets with a very small intergap (us) and than some msec nothing. While >> testing a shaping policy, the queue couldn’t handle the microbursts. >> Fortunate I was able to use the intergap Option instead of bit rate. >> >> Mausezahn: I was not able to use -a with the -b -A -B Option. Also a L3 >> dsfield would-be Nice. >> >> Best regards >> >> Jack >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "netsniff-ng" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to netsniff-ng+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > Hi Jack! > > Thank you for suggestions and report! Regarding trafgen -b option you mean > that is would be better > if the packets delay was better normalized regarding the rate ? > > Regards, > Vadim Kochan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netsniff-ng" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to netsniff-ng+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
