On 03/12/2013 02:54 AM, teddy lin wrote:

I'm testing the packet lost performance of netsniff-ng under the background
of 1Mbps ~ 100Mbps.

So, can I assume netsniff-ng runs on an embedded system?

The statistics showed by netsniff-ng is as follows (just an example, not
the real case)

             7  packets incoming
             7  packets passed filter
             0  packets failed filter (out of space)
        0.0000% packet droprate
             5  sec, 278139 usec in total

My situation is that the statistics show that no packet is being dropped
(0.0000% packet droprate ),
however the amount of packets I sent and which netsniff-ng sniffer is more
that the packet netsniff-ng received (7 packet incoming).
So is there any possibilities that netsniff-ng loss the packet but not
showed by the statistics?

From the socket point of view, nothing got lost. But e.g. assuming you're using
an embedded system and it couldn't cope with such a load then, it could also be
the case that packets got dropped earlier, at the driver layer.

Are drop counts increasing for your networking device in /proc/net/dev ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"netsniff-ng" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to