Awesome, glad to see this coming up again :) On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 04:34 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > >> On 04/07/2015 04:28 PM, Michał Purzyński wrote: >> >>> So the crash was caused by a real OOM condition, I was testing it in a >>> VM with 512MB RAM. Changed to 4GB and now I have two netsniff-ng >>> instances working and getting portion of the flows, hashed by the >>> kernel, per flow :-) >>> >>> I will work on the code and submit patches for review in a few days. >>> >> >> Ok, great, looking forward! >> > > I think you might also want to let the user choose which fanout > discipline to use in kernel side. There are several useful ones > available. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "netsniff-ng" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Jon Schipp, jonschipp.com, sickbits.net, opennsm.ncsa.illinois.edu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netsniff-ng" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
