On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:36:12AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 05:43 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:14:10PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >>On 06/01/2015 04:23 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >>...
> >>>I checked that in this case Ethernet & Netlink frames will be mixed in the
> >>>pcap file, but netsniff-ng tries to identify all the frames as Ethernet,
> >>>and in this case frames is not wrapped with cooked header.
> >>
> >>Right, so for that use case, it wouldn't work currently. I'm thinking that
> >>in case of 'any' device *and* if there's at least one device present at the
> >>time we bind the socket to any that would have netlink type, then we would
> >>need to turn on cooked mode generally, so that in such environments Ethernet
> >>and Netlink would have both cooked headers.
> >>
> >>I think that would be useful to adapt the patch towards covering such use
> >>cases as well since people might also like to correlate i.e. Netlink events
> >>together with network packets. Could you please respin the patch towards
> >>supporting this, too? Then I think, it should be ready to go in.
> ...
> >
> >Then I think link type can be set as LINKTYPE_LINUX_SLL in the pcap
> >header. May be it would be useful to use LINKTYPE_LINUX_SLL by default
> >if 'any' was specified or only if the Netlink device present in UP state ?
> 
> I'm thinking that the following might be useful for the pcap writer:
> Have an option --cooked that generally adds cooked header (no matter
> what the underlying device is, so could be 'any' as well). Whenever
> we bound our socket specifically to a nlmon device, then we enable
> that option transparently in the case of default/ns pcap.

So, the solution might be - use cooked header automatically if only
nlmon device was specified or when --cooked option was specified ?

Regards,

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"netsniff-ng" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to