On 03/13/2012 05:37 PM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 03/13/2012 02:33 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Robert Kukura <rkuk...@redhat.com >> <mailto:rkuk...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> On 03/13/2012 02:17 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > [...] >> > >> > At this point, perhaps an RFC patch would be best, so we can discuss >> > concretely, assuming you can throw it together with fairly minimal >> effort. >> >> I'm pulling everything together into my git branch right now, and would >> like to let people have a look as soon as possible. I was going to >> submit this to gerrit shortly for review, after testing locally, but >> before building and testing fedora packages that configure rootwrap and >> sudoers. Not sure if an RFC patch would be any quicker, or how to do >> that. >> >> >> You current plan sounds great. By RFC patch, i just meant something you >> could throw out there, perhaps without doing final polishing/testing. >> There's not actually a separate process, other than putting RFC in the >> header of your comments. :) > > OK, the patch is ready for review at > https://review.openstack.org/#change,5293. > > -Bob >
Our testing so far with the Quantum rootwrap functionality enabled in Fedora packages looks good, so I believe this patch is ready. Please review it today so it can be merged for RC1! In case anyone wants to examine and/or test these packages, RPMs are available for Fedora 17 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=307195 and scratch RPMs for Fedora 16 are at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3894106. Thanks, -Bob -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
