On 05/02/2012 08:20 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:


On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@redhat.com <mailto:gkot...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    On 05/02/2012 07:56 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
    Ah, Edgar wasn't at the meeting on tuesday it seems, and so
    didn't hear about our decision to try and merge your branch
    first.  In hindsight, if we ever decide on ordering commits, we
    should make sure to temporarily -2 the commits we don't want
    submitted, so that other reviewers don't come in and approve things.

    I think you can just merge it in now on top of Maru's merged
    branch.  You may want to keep a version of the current code
    around as well, as it will probably be easier to backport that
    version of the change to essex/stable (assuming there isn't too
    much additional feedback).
    I have merged it. I encountered a number of problems when I was
    running the tests. Can you please look at the comments that I
    added to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/6545/.
    I have fixed the test but not 100% sure about the loggin calls in
    the agents.
    What do you suggest?


Ok, that does seem like an issue. That change-set is now merged, so any issues with it should be filed as a bug and fixed with another change set. Thanks!
I have checked in. How do you suggest we do the stable essex bit? I am still battling with git. I guess I gotta "git" used to it.


Dan



    Dan


    On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@redhat.com
    <mailto:gkot...@redhat.com>> wrote:

        Hi,
        It seems that everything has gone pear shaped. I have
        conflicts with the "HACKING.rst" fix. From the IRC meeting
        last night I understood that I should check in first - so
        that the fix could be moved to Essex stable.
        Please advise. Sorry for being a pain, I am just new to git
        and it is a bit of a headache at the moment. My humble apologies.
        Thanks
        Gary



        ----- Original Message -----
        From: "Dan Wendlandt" <d...@nicira.com <mailto:d...@nicira.com>>
        To: gkot...@redhat.com <mailto:gkot...@redhat.com>
        Cc: "dan wendlandt (Code Review)" <rev...@openstack.org
        <mailto:rev...@openstack.org>>, "Sumit Naiksatam"
        <snaik...@cisco.com <mailto:snaik...@cisco.com>>, "Maru
        Newby" <mne...@internap.com <mailto:mne...@internap.com>>,
        "markmcclain" <mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com
        <mailto:mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com>>
        Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:55:48 AM
        Subject: Re: Change in openstack/quantum[master]: blueprint
        agent-db-ha bug 985470 bug 985646

        Ok, we have a couple of changes backed up behind this one, so
        Gary, please rev this change as soon as you can. Thanks!


        Dan


        On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Gary Kotton <
        gkot...@redhat.com <mailto:gkot...@redhat.com> > wrote:


        On 05/01/2012 11:41 PM, dan wendlandt (Code Review) wrote:


        dan wendlandt has posted comments on this change.


        Change subject: blueprint agent-db-ha bug 985470 bug 985646
        .............................. ..............................
        ..........


        Patch Set 7: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve

        Overall, looks great. One thing to note is that this
        introduces new mandatory parameters to the config files for
        the OVS plugin and the Bridge plugin, meaning if people
        update their code but have existing config files, the code
        will puke. Avoiding this would be nice, particularly as it
        will happen for everyone using devstack.

        Nova's config system has the property that all config options
        have a default embedding in the code, which avoids this. We
        don't have quite the same capability here, as such defaults
        would be scattered throughout the file.

        Thoughts on this?
        Nice point. At the moment if the parameter does not exist
        then there is an exception, it would be best to set this as
        as default. I'm happy to make the change in the code. What do
        you think? I think that the fix is also valid for Essex stable.



        --
        To view, visit https://review.openstack.org/ 6744
        To unsubscribe, visit https://review.openstack.org/ settings


        Gerrit-MessageType: comment
        Gerrit-Change-Id: I9194f142478b130e8ef198b019539 357a9916d7f
        Gerrit-PatchSet: 7

        Gerrit-Project: openstack/quantum
        Gerrit-Branch: master
        Gerrit-Owner: garyk< gkot...@redhat.com
        <mailto:gkot...@redhat.com> >

        Gerrit-Reviewer: Isaku Yamahata
        Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins
        Gerrit-Reviewer: Maru Newby< mne...@internap.com
        <mailto:mne...@internap.com> >
        Gerrit-Reviewer: Sumit Naiksatam< snaik...@cisco.com
        <mailto:snaik...@cisco.com> >
        Gerrit-Reviewer: dan wendlandt< d...@nicira.com
        <mailto:d...@nicira.com> >
        Gerrit-Reviewer: garyk< gkot...@redhat.com
        <mailto:gkot...@redhat.com> >
        Gerrit-Reviewer: markmcclain< mark.mcclain@ dreamhost.com
        <http://dreamhost.com> >





        --
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        Dan Wendlandt
        Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com <http://www.nicira.com>

        twitter: danwendlandt
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Dan Wendlandt
    Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com <http://www.nicira.com>
    twitter: danwendlandt
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com <http://www.nicira.com>
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
Post to     : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to