Hi Dave and I have encountered this problem before. One thing to do is to ensure you have the latest ovs (in 11.10 the ovs didn't like tunnels)
debo On May 8, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > resending to netstack list, reply all somehow mangled the address... > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Dan Wendlandt <d...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Hi Yong, > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Yong Sheng Gong <gong...@cn.ibm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have tried to run OVSQuantumTunnelAgent with two compute hosts. But VM on > hostb cannot get ip from dhcp server on hostb. > > If the VM and the dhcp server are both on "hostb", then packets would be > switched directly between them on br-int, they would not need to be tunneled. > Perhaps you meant one was on hosta? > > Either way, please create a bug on launchpad and attach the output of the > plugin agents running on both hosts. Thanks, > > Dan > > p.s. be sure that you've got the latest master, as there have been a couple > important bug fixes recently. > > > I found the br-tun has the flows set: > [root@robinlinux ~]# ovs-ofctl show br-tun > OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x1): ver:0x1, dpid:0000b2dea5b34a44 > n_tables:255, n_buffers:256 > features: capabilities:0xc7, actions:0xfff > 1(patch-int): addr:aa:c9:ac:8c:be:a8 > config: 0 > state: 0 > 2(gre-0): addr:76:4c:ca:ca:61:1c > config: 0 > state: 0 > 3(gre-1): addr:52:91:f7:6c:08:57 > config: 0 > state: 0 > LOCAL(br-tun): addr:b2:de:a5:b3:4a:44 > config: PORT_DOWN > state: LINK_DOWN > OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY (xid=0x3): frags=normal miss_send_len=0 > [root@robinlinux ~]# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-tun > NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): > cookie=0x0, duration=66.985s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > priority=3,tun_id=0x2 actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,output:1 > cookie=0x0, duration=69.593s, table=0, n_packets=2, n_bytes=652, > priority=4,in_port=1,dl_vlan=1 actions=set_tunnel:0x2,NORMAL > cookie=0x0, duration=1884.901s, table=0, n_packets=449, n_bytes=145796, > priority=1 actions=drop > > It seems we have just flows for connection between br-int and br-tun, have no > flows out/in for gre port. So all traffic on gre port are dropped by default > rule 3#. > > any thoughts? > > Thanks > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack > Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Dan Wendlandt > Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com > twitter: danwendlandt > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Dan Wendlandt > Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com > twitter: danwendlandt > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack > Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
