On 8/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alpt wrote: [...] > > the other advantage to use a NAT/swarm solution is to completely separate > > the mobile > > part from the static one, this is relevant because you can't think in terms > > of > > maps for mobile nodes (maybe) > yes, it's the easiest way, but it's a shame not to use all those devices for > routing :p > > Sorry, but I don't understand why mobile nodes should not have maps... > Is it becouse when they move they would generate too much traffic to update > its and other nodes' maps? I'll try to test something when i have time, i'll > let you know if i have better ideas :p > Luca.
What kind of mobile nodes are you talking about? Smartphones? PDAs? If so, a big issue here is the power consumption of a routing daemon. Just a thought. --Luca _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
