On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:00 PM, soreiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems that the english Wikipedia needs/wants some other improvements > again. :-/ > Take a look: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netsukuku > I still can't understand why what an "aggresive" on eng. page by the > administrators (are they? :)). There are so many pages on Wikipedia that > are less complete than that, and noone never complained. Plus, the > italian page never got warnings, too. > Anyone has an explanation? :) > Sincerely, the page seems not "so poor" that get warnings continuously, > IMO.
I think the problem is not about the page itself (although its very poor english form) but about the lack of other sources that are not the wikipedia page itself or the official netsukuku site. There aren't pages elsewhere that talk about netsukuku. Perhaps if the article was shorter, not deep in details, just stating the general aim of the project and linking to the main site, then it would be acceptable by the english general notability guideline. What do you think about it? Is it helpful to have a wikipedia article when the project is still at very early stage and nobody uses it? --Luca _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
