On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Alpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:16:49AM +0100, <Luca Dionisi>: > ~> I would like to know (better if from a high perspective) what is > ~> missing, so I could see if I can help. > > Quoting the main page: > """ > The last step before the first release is to debug the code, removing all the > various unexpected errors. > > If you want to help us, checkout the SVN version. > """ > (well, and I would always add: > - expand the theory, check and recheck, find mathematical proofs, and > performance analysis > ) > > There is nothing hidden. It's just what you see. > > ~> How are the developers communicating right now about the things to do > ~> to the code? > > IRL and/or by private mails. > > Right now, as you can see, there's just Eriol coding. >
Ok. Anyway, IMHO there is lack of communication. Can you tell me where am I supposed to know that there is a new branch of the code (namely networking-abstraction) and what it is supposed to exist for? Has anyone talked about it in the ML? Perhaps in the IRC and I wasn't there, it would be ok, so I asked. I don't think that there is something "hidden" intentionally. And, if there were no new code at all, I wouldn't say that the devs are lazy. It is a free project and I know that if I have time to donate I could help myself. But, since there is new code, I ask why there is no written speech about what it is meant for. And, finally, I must admit that mine is more curiosity than true possibility to help. ;P --Luca _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
