Hello, Is there any reason why we don't bind to device the UDP Server? I have this demo scenario:
(node1)[eth0]-----------[eth1](node2)[eth0]-------------[eth0](node3) When node3, f.e., sends a radar.reply node2 sees it twice, one coming through eth0 and one from eth1. The same goes starting from node1 This is wrong. The message comes only once from one interface. Indeed, we launch <n> MicroUDPServer, but the 'dev' we specify for each one is not used. Should we use sk_bindtodevice? _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
