Hi,

i don't know much about the wireless data link layer but this drew my
attention a couple of months before:
http://www.wi-fi.org/news_articles.php?f=media_news&news_id=909

maybe it makes thinks easier? :)


On 10 March 2010 17:01, Korvin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello guys, I have some info/ideas here that need to be discussed.
>
> Some time ago I wrote an article at some of russian IT community sites
> (habrahabr.ru), which caused a lot of response.
>
> One of commentars was quite sceptic about actual possibility of widespread
> mesh newtork. He provided two interesting links as a proof:
>
> 1)
> http://www.strixsystems.com/products/datasheets/StrixWhitepaper_Multihop.pdf
> 2) http://www.belairnetworks.com/resources/pdfs/Mesh_Capacity_BDMC00040-
> C02.pdf
>
> These papers are analyzing current wireless technologies in terms of mesh
> networking. Authors are saying, that modern single channel AP's are almost
> unusable in large scale networks, as latency/bandwidth degradation gets more
> and more valuable. They said that even 5 hops may kill the idea (huh?) even on
> almost noise-clean environment.
>
> Their main argument is half duplex nature of modern WiFi and need of backhaul
> traffic forwarding along with the user one. Authors conclude that mesh 
> networks
> may exist only with respect to separation of user/backhaul traffic
> frequencies/channels.
>
> Could you please give a feedback/comment about it?
>
> -----
>
> Anyway, whether this is true or not, I may suggest some ideas which probably
> may be taken in mind:
>
> Overpopulated regions with many WiFi hotspots may experience problems with the
> lack of free channels. Overinterference may cause major slowdown of the whole
> thing.
>
> If we'll try to consciously distribute the channels on our network things may
> change. My suggestion is to use some kind of map colouring algorithm.
>
> Look at the picture on the page
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_color_theorem Suppose that different colors
> are representing different channels of WiFi, and different shapes reflecting
> radiowave interference on the urban relief.
>
> Because we know the placement and interconnection of our own spots, we may
> select the frequencies in a way to minimize interference with other networks,
> yet achieving good connectivity of our own. Of course this is almost opposite
> poles and improvement of one will lead to other's degradation.
>
> The key may be in multi channel spanning of the network, which needed to be
> handled by Netsukuku protocols.
>
> Suppose we have two nodes:
>   ((( A )))   [[[ B ]]]
> A operates on channel 6 and B on channel 10. In the current design different
> channels are treated as completely different networks which may not be aware 
> of
> each other. Netsukuku daemons running on both nodes could not see each other,
> thus could not take this into account.
>
> Now we adding two more WiFi spots: A2 and B2 linked to their companion by
> ethernet cable. Operating channels are reversed:
>   [(  (A)<-->[A2]  )]   <~~link~~>  [(  [B] <--> (B2)  )]
>
> Now all four nodes may be interconnected into one subnet. Of course, this may
> be done without any protocol updates. But if nodes will be aware of channels,
> they may intentionally select the operating channel to increase overall
> span/quality. On a heavy loaded environment we may intentionally create
> several layers of Netsukuku using the colouring method described above.
>
> By analyzing current state and channel utilization, nodes may vote and decide
> to migrate to another channel if it will improve the overall quality. On the
> other hand, such migration may lead to a network split if there are no border
> nodes linked to a previous channel and fallback internet tunnels are also
> unavailable.
>
>
>
>
> P.S. I was told that recent Linksys APs have two or even three independent
> transcievers builtin. Such APs may operate on many channels at once and thus
> may be used as such ‘supernode’. (actually I don't know whether such devices
> are really exist. maybe this is not true)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netsukuku mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
>
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku

Reply via email to