On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:01 PM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, this proposal is cross-layer. You are binding the routing > protocol to a specific radio equipment. Is this what you want ? We > want to get rid of ISO/OSI so quickly ?
This is important, IMHO. Netsukuku is a routing protocol, we should discuss about issues at that level. That is, level 3 of OSI. > Please before starting to propose new ideas, everybody should have a > look to the state of the art, like OLSR, BABEL, BATMAN, the Freifunk > network in Berlin etc etc .... we don't need to start from 0 again :) Right, again. If you feel you have an interesting idea about wireless communications, then maybe you should propose it to the proper audience. (after having read and understood the state of the art, of course) Frankly, I don't think netsukuku is the right place. --Luca _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
