On 09/10/2013 12:12 AM, Coyo wrote:
Interesting. Sounds like Vala is the one we want, then.
I'm still waiting to figure out how to test vala locally.
I don't even know where the code is.
On 09/09/2013 09:41 PM, Valeska Grim wrote:
From: Alexei <[email protected]>
As I understand, netsukuku-python is a test implementation. It is pretty
ready software but is not very demanded because of it does not run on
modern routers. So vala version is universal, it is faster and more
preferable in every way, but as I guess very few people want work with
vala. I thing if vala version will not be done, after some time people
start using and develop python version on some new generation of hardware.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Miss Valeska <[email protected]>wrote:
Also! With Stackless python, Or any of those other dependencies, Does the
version matter? The version in the commands is 2.6.2, But would it matter
if I used the most recent version? If so, Does this also apply to the other
dependencies?
Oh, Finally, Will netsukuku-python be continued? Or is netsukuku-vala
going to take over? I think I prefer netsukuku-vala, I'm not sure, Being it
works on routers though, That is very good. However, I'm just curious about
your plans Luca. I assume vala will take over.
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
I don't exactly believe that, The python version worked on openwrt
routers, Now it is just out dated because it hasn't been mantained in
years. The C version did too, The C version and python version are just
as universal and fast. I don't know what "preferable in every way"
means, But, I don't see how vala has anything that C, Or, C++, Doesn't.
If you can correct me, I'd be glad to know.
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
