What about the BSD license? Seems similar to MIT except it adds a clause like: Neither the name of NetSurf nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
I'm OK with a less restrictive license, but after reading up on a few of them I think I'd feel more comfortable knowing Company XYZ can't use the NetSurf name or my name in promotion unless they have permission to do so. What do you guys think? On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:18:39 -0500 > "Sean Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have no problem with a license change as long as the other >> contributors agree. > > Well, the only other contributor to that code is Richard, and he's OKed > the changing of licence of any of his code to MIT. If you agree to > MIT, then I think we have a goer. > > B. > >
