On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:03:43AM -0800, o...@eigenstate.org wrote: > Quoth Thorsten Otto <ad...@tho-otto.de>: > > On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2021 19:09:35 CET Jonas wrote: > > > What do you think? > > > > I think that a compiler that defines size_t to be 32bit on a 64bit system > > is > > broken ;) > > It's perfectly legal -- size_t is required to hold > the maximum allowed object size. It's not required > to be able to span the address space, or anything > like that.
It's legal, but that doesn't have any relation to if it is sensible, or if this is a bug. Plan 9 is not sensible. And this is a bug in NetSurf. B. _______________________________________________ netsurf-dev mailing list -- netsurf-dev@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-dev-le...@netsurf-browser.org
