On 15 Sep 2007 John-Mark Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you're launching the URL from another application, it could well be > the result of some limit related to Wimp message processing.
[snip] > This limit will certainly affect the ANT URL protocol (as, to my > knowledge, nothing sends the indirect form of the message). I've never see one myself either. > I can't recall off-hand if the Acorn URI protocol bypasses the limit. The URL is copied in to the URI Distpatcher modules workspace, and a pointer is passed around in the message, so is independant of the wimp message length. > Most apps try the ANT protocol first, however, so it's somewhat of a > moot point. I don't know what most apps are doing, but I thought that the accepted wisdom is to check for the presence of the URIDispatch SWIs and use if present, only dropping back to the ANT URL broadcast protocol if not present. Cheers ---Dave -- ______________________________________________________________________ David J. Ruck Phone: +44- (0)7974 108301 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________
