On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:03:29 +0000 (GMT) Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Drake > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Validation results aren't a guarantee of anything. > > It's a start. > > The chances are that if they can't get that bit right... Not really. The validity of the HTML has almost no relation what-so-ever to it being rendered correctly. It's much more likely that NetSurf simply doesn't support features that a given author may select to use. With its new HTML5 parser, NetSurf parses broken and invalid HTML really quite well. B.
