On 2 Dec 2010 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:32:18PM +0000, Richard Porter wrote: >> On 2 Dec 2010 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> The problem is, as you said yourself, we are not sure what the issue is. >> You didn't answer my question: is it possible for NS to execute old >> code whilst still announcing itself to be the current version? > Code, no. The revision number is encoded inside the !RunImage. Data, > it's possible; I've not looked. That's what I would have thought, but I can't see how, when you inadvertantly boot an obsolete version, you get bugs that were present in that version and when you reboot the correct application, without quitting and re-running it, it comes all right again. This is easy to demonstrate. Maybe that particular bug was data-related. The good thing is that I've done a change to SiteMatch which should stop it picking up obsolete data files if the app$Dir variable is accidentally changed. The path is stored on start-up. -- Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a user experience; I just want stuff that works.
