> On 27 May 2017, at 5:01 pm, Tim Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > In article <[email protected]>, cj > <[email protected]> wrote: >> In article <[email protected]>, Tim >> Powys-Lybbe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, > >>> I've just found that the SUP HTML command does not superimpose in >>> Netsurf 3.3, so I got the latest versio, 3.6, nor in that, finally I >>> read the advice and got last night's 4088 build and it still didn't, >>> so I wonder if this is something that I have not read about. Is >>> <SUP> not a recognised modern feature? > >> I have a feeling that SUP (and SUB) have never been implemented. I had >> a lot of trouble when making chemistry related web pages years ago. > > I find that both <sup> and a defined CSS class ("super") both render > superscripts correctly in 3.7 #4085. > > www.timil.com/temp/superscript.htm
Ah, that suggests that SUP works correctly within CSS but not within old-fashioned simple HTML, which is what I use. -- Tim Powys-Lybbe [email protected] for a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/
