Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:38:42 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: a better socket
Now on this "interface" question of a socket, where David
Colston himself said he would be uncertain about what to
use/declare/offer.
A good answer would be to have it be compatible with the
WATTCP specifications (where even dosppp relies on), which
are open source. A lot of clients build on this, and many
people use it - all the KA9Q users, uka, the (wasn't it
Australian in origin) [DOS-]Network-OS, and a host of
other.
And the perfect answer would be to make it open source,
straightforward.
The recent development has shown that there is quite well
a real market, and that people *do* pay for the stuff they
use and which comes with open source. I would be one of
them, as declared already. (And luckily, not everyone is a
programmer.)
// Heimo Claasen // <hammer at revobild dot net> //
Brussels 2000-11-27
The WebPlace of ReRead - and much to read ==>
http://www.inti.be/hammer
Subject: [SURVPC] Poll on buying Nettamer PPP socket -
from Nettamer
********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the single word
Unsubscribe
as the subject.
You MUST use the same address with which you subscribed!
********************************************************
