.
http://www.plus.el-estudio.net/harte/arspublica0307.html





ARS PUBLICA – Ana Buigues´ report. March 27th, 2007.

 

What follows is the curator’s report on the development of the Ars Publica 
project  http://www.arspublica.noemata.net/

based on the theoretical context for the ¨raison d´être¨ of this net.art 
project.

 

The inception of the Ars Publica project started in the second half of 2005, 
when we, the Ars Publica team, in view of the lack of a painstaking study about 
the art market from the artists´ point of view, felt the need to fill this void 
through the realization of a study that would include art theory and case 
studies in a project that would be a combination between an academic article 
and an art project.  After NKR (Norsk Kulturråd - Arts Council Norway) approved 
our application and granted us financial support in January 2006,  via the  
Kunst og ny teknologi fond (Art and Technology Fund), we were able to conduct 
most part of the research. Bjørn Magnhildøen as net.artist and programmer 
established the ¨physical¨[1] point of departure - the Ars Publica web site, 
which includes the net art sale exhibition, the library and the museum.  Thanks 
to Magnhildøen´s  technical implementation of the dynamics of electronic 
commerce the Ars Publica web site is completely prepared for the interaction 
with the public and customers.

 

Until now we have focused on the general public front, having collected records 
about the responses obtained from the public who accessed Ars Publica from the 
Internet, as well as from a few off line performances, as Magnhildøen explains 
in his report of the project:

http://arspublica.noemata.net/blog/2007/04/rapport-ars-publica-42007.html.

 

 

            In the next months we will concentrate on the marketing of our 
project on the elitist front: established art and culture institutions.  We are 
presently working on the design of CDs and DVDs to be distributed to world wide 
libraries, museums, and universities.  The contents of the CDs and DVDs will 
consist of a version of the Ars Publica project accompanied by a critical essay 
written by the curator, Ana Buigues, contextualizing this art project.  The 
essay is still under development and what follows are excerpts from some of its 
sections.  The entire text will be published in the Ars Publica web site as 
soon as it is completed.

 

Ars Publica : The Art Market and Corporate Parody

-----------------------------------------------------------

 

The tradition of corporate parody in conceptual art and literature, includes, 
among others, the works of General Idea, Yves Klein, and Robert Morris with 
pieces about monetary value of art, or Hans Haacke's interventions in social 
economy, like the series of Manhattan Real Estate Holdings, 1971 --  as well as 
his collaboration with Bourdieu, in the dialogue Libre-échange, 1994.

 

Ars Publica basically is a commentary on the paradox that while art constitutes 
another type of production to be commercialized, the financial situation in 
which most artists encounter themselves, is due  to a sub-paradox that responds 
on the one hand to the irrelevant socio-economic value generally associated 
with art; and on the other hand with the elitist channels of art 
commercialization. Artworks have come to be considered consumer goods and, as 
such, depend on the laws of offer and demand, functioning within free-market 
structures based on price competition.  However, perhaps these principles 
cannot always be applied to the world of culture and art, and instead of a 
growing 'cultural industry' closely linked to the 'art market,' what artists 
might rather need is certain protection from the State, since there are some 
activities which cannot be measured solely by the economic benefit they 
generate. Neither can the value of a specific artist be determined solely by 
the prices previously paid for her/his works, or by the promotion art dealers 
and art critics attach to a certain type of art or artist (based on both their 
economic self interest and personal preferences, which, in turn, may also be 
linked to their connections to the art market).

 

The project Ars Publica is a mélange of interventions within social networks: 
what we know as situationism, urban art/action, political protest, performance, 
and net.art, with an emphasis on the economies of [artistic] loss and 
[economic] profit. The foundations of Situationism, and Fluxus will present the 
existing analogies among the Internet networks, urban zones, and social 
structures that mediate our perception of the world, and how they can be 
challenged through certain actions and interventions.  The Baudrillardian 
concepts of simulacrum and spectacle, are also included here to deal with the 
distorted, and accommodated messages transmitted by the media, and in this case 
through the Internet, and how it has fulfilled the needs for the consumers of a 
society of spectacle and entertainment. As it is known, the Situationist 
International (SI), formed in 1957 and leaded by Guy Debord and Asger Jorn's 
were a group of artists and political theorists, with a Marxist and anarchist 
ideology, who rebelled against bourgeois societly values, in line with the 
traditions of Dada, Surrealism, CoBrA, and Fluxus.  They were strongly opposed 
to a growing consummerist society and their artistic statements commented on 
concepts of art production and trade.  Some of their actions included attacks 
to established art circles and academies.[2]

 

 

Ars Publica : Art + Technology  = Public Domain

----------------------------------------------

 

In 1968 Barthes theorized the elimination of the author as the ultimate 
creator.  An effect of this theorizing has been to assign a new, protagonist 
role to the spectator, that depends on the ways that a given spectator 
interprets and conceptualizes a given artwork.  Walter Benjamin’s famous 
elaboration of the aura surrounding the sacred object and the artwork took  as 
a positive sign its disintegration. [3]  Michel Foucault  also took  up these 
conceptions  in a particular way that interests us here, since he emphasized 
the operations of power in society. Foucault  conceives of the author and 
artist-genius as a Romantic myth imbued with patriarchy and elitism. [4]  In 
his revision of history, he analyses the discourses of power, knowledge, and 
truth and their legitimation through social institutions, arguing that   
individuals, rather than institutions, can and do transmit certain power and 
knowledge to different strata of society.  He also suggests that what we call 
an "author" varies from period to period according to the social function 
assigned to the author.

 

Ars Publica : net art

------------------------

 

We must call to mind that while the media has contributed to the spread of 
cultural stereotypes, standards of acculturation, consumerist bombarding, and 
power centralization, Internet activity continues this legacy on the one hand 
(when the Net acts as a mass media tool) and tries to break from it on the 
other hand (when activist networks enter the game). The use of the Internet for 
political contestation is what is known as “hacktivism,” in which a hacker’s 
rebellious mentality and activist commitment meet. Again, “hackers” without 
computers existed before, since radical artists have been commenting on social 
injustice and art institutions firstly subtly and later more openly, and made 
use of either mainstream or underground transmitters for many years. The 
Internet contribution to this aspect is higher bandwidth, a complimentary 
effect to off line activism, omni directionality and participation.  Secondly, 
there is the concept of simulacra and e-commerce, advertisement and media, that 
also bears some attention, making the critique to capitalism and consumer art 
culture more easily 'believable'.  The Internet offers a whole new scope and 
scale to such strategies, since it constitutes the virtual reality version of 
social and economic reality

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] The word _physical_ is here in quotation marks due to the virtual nature of 
a web site, although nowadays the widespread use of the Internet has almost 
turned the virtual spaces into physical ones.

[2] The Situationist International (SI) was formed in 1957 as the result of the 
merging of the Lettrist International leaded by Guy Debord and Asger Jorn's 
International Movement for an Imaginist Bauhaus (IMIB).  The situationists 
envisioned a somehow 'ideal city' where its inhabitants would have a more 
playful, meaningful and just life. They created sketches of their envisioned 
city which reminds one of the Utopian Socialists such as Charles Fourier, 
Etienne-Louis Boullee, etc.  Psychogeography was used to describe the study of 
the urban environment’s effects on the psyche. The situationists produced 
psychogeographical reports based on the results of their dérives (drifting).  
They saw themselves as abolishing the notion of art as a separate, specialized 
activity and transforming it so was part of fabric of everyday life.

Charles Harrison and Paul Wood, "Art and Modern Life," in Art in Theory, 
1900-1990, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1992) 693-700.

Further reference to other aspects of the situationists, such as de 
detournement and 'spectacle' are provided further ahead in this chapter.

[3] German-Jewish philosopher Walter Benjamin (1892-40), working within the 
context of the Marxist Frankfurt School envisioned to a certain degree some of 
our postmodern cultural and artistic conditions. He provided a model for how 
the artist might function politically through changing the forms of artistic 
production.  In “The Author as Producer,”1934, he argued that the uniqueness of 
the aura of a work of art, would be eliminated and  that this would result in a 
more democratic consumption of imagery, since until then art appreciation and 
ownership were reserved for an elitist public, where art would shift from that 
negative theology dependant on the aura, fetish, and ritual, to be based on 
politics. Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical 
Reproduction,” See Charles Harrison and Paul Wood, “Freedom, Responsibility and 
Power,” in Art in Theory, 1900-1990, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 
1992), 512-519, “The Author as Producer,” Harrison and Wood, Ibid, 483-488. 

[4] Keith. Moxey, The Practice of Theory. Poststructuralism, Cultural Politics, 
and Art History. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994), 56



    

By Ana Buigues    -  Curator of Ars Publica
http://www.plus.el-estudio.net/cvw.html

_______________________________________________
nettime-ann mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ann

Reply via email to