It definitely won't feel like a relief, but here's an article from today's WSJ
opinion pages that says Microsoft is not the only western company to ignore the
obligations under international law.

Mladen


The Electronic Kowtow

"Where do you want to go today?"

That was the Microsoft's slogan in the mid-1990s, one intended to evoke the
unlimited possibilities inherent in the age of the Internet and the software
revolution. But the answer to that same questions today would be, "hopefully not
where they discuss 'freedom', 'democracy' and 'human rights'," at least not if 
you
expect to do so using Microsoft's new portal in China.

The Redmond, Washington software giant has just caved in to the Chinese 
government,
and in a most ignominious way, by banning these words. If you try to type them 
on
Microsoft's new portal, a message appears telling you, according to news 
reports,
that "this item should not contain forbidden speech such as profanity. Please 
enter
a different word for this item."

Microsoft's spokesmen in China and Hong Kong did not respond to repeated 
attempts
to reach them, and a Beijing public relations company hired by Microsoft said in
answers to questions emailed that, "MSN abides by the laws, regulations and 
norms
of each country in which it operates."

The ban is in effect in MSN Spaces, a Web site-hosting service created last 
month
that allows consumers to post diaries, or blogs. So in effect the Chinese
government, with Microsoft's help, is trying to prevent pro-democracy blogs.

To be fair to Microsoft, it is not alone. Yahoo! and Google have also caved in 
to
China. Google, the last previous one to do so, back in October, chose to omit
sources the Chinese government does not like from its Google News China edition.
The California company said, sensibly enough, that it hardly made sense to 
provide
a link to sites that would probably be blank anyway.

But not everyone takes such a rosy view. "It's outrageous," said Human Rights 
Watch
researcher Sara Davis when we reached her. "What's obscene is the degree of
censorship that exists in China right now and that international companies are
ignoring their obligations under international law," added Ms. Davis, referring 
to
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which guarantees 
everyone
the right to free expression.  "This is an electronic kowtow."

It is admittedly difficult for China's government to block Internet content from
its estimated 87 million users, a number that is growing. But it is a lot 
easier if
it has the cooperation of the industry. These large corporations should also
remember that China's leaders need their business - the Internet is where demand
and supply meet these days, and China's leaders need economic growth to 
continue if
they are not to face large-scale upheaval. Certainly the Microsofts and Googles
might try to drive a harder bargain.


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net

Reply via email to